AI Legal Chatbot
Documents
Cases
Laws
Law Firms
LPMS
Quizzes
Login
Join
Republic v Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Law Society of Kenya [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Court
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Judicial Review Division
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
John M. Mativo
Judgment Date
October 08, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3
Case Summary
Full Judgment
Explore the case summary of Republic v Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Law Society of Kenya [2020] eKLR. Discover key legal insights and implications in this landmark decision.
Case Brief: Republic v Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Law Society of Kenya [2020] eKLR
1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: Republic v. Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 Others
- Case Number: HCJR/E045/2020
- Court: High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Judicial Review Division
- Date Delivered: 8th October 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): John M. Mativo
- Country: Kenya
2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issues for resolution in this case include:
- Whether the existence of two suits challenging the same decision constitutes an abuse of court process.
- Whether the second suit offends the doctrine of sub judice, which prohibits the simultaneous litigation of the same issue in different courts.
3. Facts of the Case:
The applicant in this case is the Republic, represented by the Law Society of Kenya (LSK). The respondents are Paul Kihara Kariuki, the Attorney General, and two others. The case arose from a decision made by the National Development and Communication Cabinet Committee on 8th July 2020, which directed ministries and state departments not to engage external counsel without the Attorney General's approval. The LSK, through its Nairobi Branch, had previously filed a similar suit (HCJR No. E010 of 2020) challenging the same decision. Both suits sought orders of certiorari and prohibition against the Cabinet's decision.
4. Procedural History:
Upon the virtual hearing of the case, the court noted the existence of the earlier suit filed by the LSK Nairobi Branch. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ochiel, suggested consolidating the two cases, while the State's counsel, Mr. Bitta, opposed consolidation, arguing that the later suit was an abuse of court process. The court invited both parties to formally address the propriety of having two identical suits pending simultaneously.
5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered the Civil Procedure Act, particularly sections 5 and 6, which address the jurisdiction of courts and the doctrine of sub judice, respectively. The sub judice rule prevents courts from hearing cases that are substantially similar to already pending cases.
- Case Law: The court referenced several precedents, including *Stumberg v. Potgeiter* and *Law Society of Kenya v. Centre for Human Rights and Democracy*, which outline the principles of case consolidation and the sub judice doctrine. The Supreme Court of Kenya emphasized the importance of avoiding conflicting decisions and the waste of judicial resources.
- Application: The court found that both suits challenged the same decision and sought identical relief. It noted that the issues raised in the second suit were directly and substantially in issue in the first suit. Therefore, allowing both suits to proceed would violate the doctrine of sub judice and constitute an abuse of court process, as it would lead to unnecessary duplication and potential conflicting judgments.
6. Conclusion:
The court ruled that the second suit was struck off on the grounds of it being an abuse of court process and for offending the sub judice rule. The decision reinforces the importance of judicial efficiency and the avoidance of multiple proceedings over the same issues.
7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions recorded in this case.
8. Summary:
The High Court of Kenya in *Republic v. Paul Kihara Kariuki* held that the second suit filed by the main body of the Law Society of Kenya was an abuse of court process due to its similarity to a previously filed suit by the Nairobi Branch. The ruling emphasized the doctrine of sub judice, which prevents multiple litigations on the same issue, thereby promoting judicial efficiency and resource conservation. The case highlights the judiciary's commitment to preventing the misuse of court processes and maintaining order in legal proceedings.
Document Summary
Below is the summary preview of this document.
This is the end of the summary preview.
๐ข Share this document with your network
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Related Documents
In re Estate of Edward Syalo Lutilo (Deceased) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
JNN v LWG [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Elisha Ochieng Odhiambo v Booker Ngesa Omole [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Gregory Kiema Kyumaa v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Water and Irrigation & 2 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Attorney General & another v Okiya Omtatah Okoiti & 4 others Case Summary
Jane Wanjiku Mwangi & another v Nathan Ndegwa Njeru [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Mohamed Shally Sese (suing as the administrator of the estate of the late Shali Sese) v Edward Mzee Karezi & 10 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Yh Wholesalers & another v Kenya Orient Insurance Co Ltd & another; Nathan Mbithi Wambua (Suing as the Legal Representative of the estate of Brian Mwendwa Mbithi [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Joswa Kenyatta v Civicon Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kasalu Nzioka Mwilu v Joyce Ndunge Mutei [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Charles Njenga Gatimu v Kenya National Authority [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Emmanuel Wanjala Wamalwa v Robert Pavel Oimeke & 5 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Prayosha Ventures Limited v NIC Bank Ltd & another; Beartice Jeruto Kipketer & another (Interested Parties) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
In re T (Baby) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Peter Odunya Onyango v Almas Electronics E.A Ltd & 3 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
David Kimalel Birir v Sammy Kiprotich Tangus & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Simon Waweru Mugo v Alice Mwongeli Munyao [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Protus Hamisi Wambanda v Elizabeth Shijeyi Shava; Eldoret Hospital (Interested Party) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
New International Consultancy Company Limited (Suing by A Power of Attorney No. P/A 65175/1 of Apexvision Limited) & another v Telkom Kenya & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Jacob Kiptoo Sembele v Josephine Gicuku Ireri [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Remmy Mwanzo Mwandzomari v Rishard Hela Mkuva & 4 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
View all summaries